XXVII
It used to be an integral part of conventional wisdom that
the function of education was to sharpen the faculties of cognition in general
and deductive reasoning, in particular.
In this light, except for the fact that I have delved into the subject
at length earlier
elsewhere {see, e.g., ch. 11, 13, 14, 20, & 24 op. cit.} this piece
could have been titled “Consternation with Education.” It is deemed proper to focus on medication,
however, as it has been the trigger issue that incited this writing.
It behooves to emphasize that I do not approach the subject
with a smidgen of nonchalance. Since I
chanced into an eighteen-hour open heart surgery on 30-Aug-2007, as described
in detail on chapter 22 of the earlier cited “Flirting
. . . , etc.” book, I have been in the care of several specialized branches
of medicine with routine follow-up sessions at regular intervals.
The gamut of referrals include: cardiology,
gastro-intestinal medicine, vascular surgery, infectious diseases,
ophthalmology, dentistry, neurology, orthopedics, and hematology. The last one was added by my primary care
physician yesterday, 20-Feb-2015, pursuant to my latest blood work results.
But here’s the proverbial Shakespearean
rub:~~ The higher the tally of specialties gets, the more muddled the
health landscape devolves into, and the more disjointed the healthcare picture
becomes. The proliferation of widgets is
never conducive to the emergence of a coherent gestalt unless tempered with a
generous does of deductive reasoning buttressed in common sense.
Lest I be construed as somewhat unhinged, let’s get into
some specifics. On 15-Feb-2010, less
than thirty months after the open heart surgery (30-Aug-2007) gave me my aortic
valve implant and quadruple cardiac bypasses, I was diagnosed with a Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) and got Plavix 75mg in the bargain. This was roughly coeval with getting
cobalt-cadmium stents in all four cardiac grafts. I learned then that I was to be on Plavix
while I keep the cardiac stents; meaning, for the rest of my natural life, or
until an alternate for Plavix is embraced by the health care community.
In early spring of 2013, a shade over three years after I
was on Plavix, I ended up at the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of the GI Department
at Stony Brook University Medical Center (SBUMC) with internal bleeding. At home, the external manifestation of my
malady was Black Diarrhea and overall weakening of my constitution. I was simply too lethargic to do anything
else beyond calling an ambulance.
It took me all of twelve hours at the ER for routine testing
protocols, one week at the ICU and one more week at the general ward for
follow-up observations. In that interim
I got two units of blood transfusion to remedy my low platelet count. I learned that I only have half a liver left,
and that I had advanced esophageal varices which were made to account for the
internal bleeding.
In the bargain, they sent me a legion of narcotics drug
and/or alcoholism addiction counselors, preachers and kindred soldiers of good
intention in an endless cavalcade with the view of recruiting me into their
fold. It seemed to have not occurred to
the powers that be that internal bleeding has been a well-known side effect of
Plavix, if one bothered to search extant literature,
available in cyberspace as far back as 2006. I was retrofitted into a ready-made
demographics and sociological template of health care provisioning with nary a
regard for my medical history.
A cursory attempt at making a coherent gestalt of my medical
landscape would have rendered my being on Plavix an obvious factor contributing
to my proclivity for seemingly unprovoked bleeding. That it is not being done as a rule makes it
more frustrating for us on the receiving end.
No comments:
Post a Comment