A
Blizzard that Never Was Beyond Benign
Blow,
blow, thou winter wind.
Thou art not so unkind
As man’s ingratitude;
Thy tooth is not so keen,
Because thou art not seen,
Although thy breath be rude.
Thou art not so unkind
As man’s ingratitude;
Thy tooth is not so keen,
Because thou art not seen,
Although thy breath be rude.
The religious acolytes of Global Warming are collectively twisting themselves into Brooklyn
pretzels or the more elaborately designed pigtails of most Mongolian warlords to spin the latest spell of the winter
Polar Vortex into an appropriate fit for the global warming narrative. The
endeavor to retrofit a natural phenomenon into the template of a pre-conceived
hypothesis that serves as the main vehicle for a social advocacy agenda has the
unintended effect of distorting the quality of the event to appear more severe
than it actually is.
It behooves to emphasize sans
apologies that the existence of atmospheric vortices had been sufficiently established
by Helmholtz 150 years ago to behave according to the Navier-Stokes nonlinear partial differential equations in fluid dynamics. Ergo, long before Al Gore was a hint of a
glint in his father’s eyes for a hormonal escapades, the physics of vortices
was a settled science.
The introduction of
“polar vortex” terminology into the global warming lexicon is nothing more than
an attempt by an unhinged movement to impress and deceive a gullible public
into believing that a highfalutin term could lend credence and respectability to
the movement’s rhetoric.
It’s
difficult to avoid the impression that the younger generation has become soft and
somnambulant in both understanding and handling natural-physical
adversity. There was a time when I had
to hike both ways of a normally forty-five minute tramcar ride from my living
quarters to school to take my finals in Organic Chemistry when all public
transportation was suspended, snowed out if you will.
Kyoto
University did not reschedule the exams and I did not make such a big deal
about the rather memorable trek. I could
not even write about it until now and that was the winter of 1967. Apparently, either the public is getting soft
or the reporting infrastructure has gotten super idle it does not have much to talk
about. To compensate for the deficit and
salvage its relevance, the media has resorted to exaggerating the gravity of
events.
This
is not to rule out the likelihood that the media has just been preparing the
public for the worst while hoping for the best.
Giving anybody credit for good intentions is benign until the unintended
consequences of good intentions backfire as they often do.
I
observed on my Facebook page while the snow was falling that it bordered on the
amazing how a blizzard was much more fascinatingly enjoyable when appreciated
from the warmth and comfort behind my glass window. Having been acutely aware that I would not
even be allowed to take part in the clean-up proceedings in its aftermath when
the storm finally settled down, the so-called storm had not even made it to my
list of emergency concerns.
The
County Sanitation contractor crew cleared the heart of Howe Court, the main
access to my residence, before I went to bed. The accumulation appeared to be
of very fine-grained powdery type~~a potential back-breaker to shovel off the
ground. I looked forward to posting on
Facebook amusing pictures of the landscape by the morrow.
I
ended up having to apologize for not being able to deliver on my intention to
post pictures of the “blizzard.” To
begin with, there really was not much of a blizzard to write home about. My grandson cleared up the driveway and
walk-paths before I could find my boots to go outside and take pictures, not to
mention about trying to find the upload-enabled camera.
Lest
the political angle is lost in the shuffle, let it stay on the record that the
blizzard that was not, served as the centerpiece of the newly installed New
York City mayor’s first order of business. It was immaterial that there was less than
six inches of snow on the ground. The
most important point is he paid proper obeisance to the Sanitation Workers’
Union whose coffers are one of the more reliable sources of the Democrat
Party’s campaign funds.
Mayor
De Blasio, for all practical purposes sails left of the
activist
retired entertainer Harry Belafonte. The
mayor is the one who has the electoral mandate to translate, by whatever means,
into harsh reality the Utopian fantasies of good old calypso Harry. Belafonte only parleys the dreams and phantasms
of social equality. Mayor De Blasio distributes
the dollars and cents and kindred resources.
For starters, he assured expectant Gothamites that under his watch the distribution of
snow plows
to liberate the hapless New Yorkers from the clutches of the blizzard shall be
equitable amongst Gotham’s five boroughs.
All
the electorate need to do is make sure they stay out of the way of those
devoted sanitation workers so they can perform their jobs with due diligence
unencumbered by the petty daily chores of New Yorkers living their lives. The scarcer they keep themselves the safer
they would be. This projected the profile
of the Nanny State at its finest.
Mayor
De Blasio having been elected by “74%
to 24% — the largest margin of victory by a non-incumbent in any mayor’s
race in city history,” appeared somewhat justified in claiming an electoral
mandate for his agenda. The qualifier “somewhat”
is in order because this margin was dwarfed by Pres. Obama’s winning “81%
of the vote in New York City in 2012.”
Usurpation of political prerogatives being the hallmark of the Obama paradigm of governance, Mayor De Blasio had deservedly earned the mantle of distinction as implementor par excellence of Pres. Obama’s progressive statist designs on Americans of any and all political persuasions.
Usurpation of political prerogatives being the hallmark of the Obama paradigm of governance, Mayor De Blasio had deservedly earned the mantle of distinction as implementor par excellence of Pres. Obama’s progressive statist designs on Americans of any and all political persuasions.
~~William
Shakespeare,
As You Like It
What was disconcerting about the whole episode was that with four inches of snow on the ground, commercial activity used to come to a standstill only when you were far south of the Mason-Dixon line {cf,http://www.udel.edu/johnmack/mason_dixon/}.
ReplyDeleteIn my neck of the woods, when they declared both the Nichols road and the Sagtikos Highway, both major access arteries for my wife’s commute to work, as temporarily not navigable, I was somewhat relieved that she could stay home without having to come up with a reason. That used to be par for the course when the accumulation was north of six inches.
When it was operational at six inches and/or south thereof, one cannot avoid the suspicion that the Sanitation Workers Union had somehow embellished the risk to over stress their importance to the infrastructure.