Most
chances as begot of discontent
Of
others, prove best opportunitiesTo probe the limits of your worth; else, vent
Your umbrage at some worthless legacies:
Such are the monuments of gross incompetence,
Much shame well-hid in codes for else ill-hidden sins!
That the regime even attempted to sell this narrative
to the American people is yet another instance of the contempt that the Obama
Regime holds vis-à-vis the intelligence and sensibilities of the American
people.
Apparently, despite President Obama’s explicit
claims to being sympathetic to the Muslim agenda because of
his capacity for better resonance with Islamic sensibilities stemming from his
father being a Muslim socialist and having spent part of his boyhood in
Indonesia under the tutelage of his Muslim stepfather, the POTUS had not heard
of Islamic
Triumphalism. He
therefore could not even suspect that the jihadists would seek to celebrate the
anniversary of their initial 11-Sep-2001 exploits with another successful
assault on American sovereignty.
He was too pre-occupied in his mission to keep his job.
He did not even bother to reinforce the
security measures around our domains abroad.
This gross negligence took place notwithstanding explicit warnings from
no less a reliable source than the Muslim
Brotherhood.
Every American worth a grain of salt should seriously
and deliberately ask: if President Obama can so audaciously flaunt about his
blatant disregard for the security of the country at the height of his campaign
for re-election, to which direction would he stir the ship of state once he
gets re-elected? What exactly was the nature
and scope of the flexibility he pledged to Putin to be at his disposal during a
second Obama term?
When the traditional media painstakingly avoided asking
this question they abandoned their once exalted role as the voice of the national
conscience. They effectively became
protectors and enablers of the recalcitrant mendacity that characterizes the
Obama White House.
Thus it came to pass that after the Cairo Embassy
perimeter was breached, the best response the regime could deliver was fifteen
hours of deafening silence. This was the
historical equivalent of Nero playing the fiddle while Rome burnt down. In marine ballistics parlance, this was the
logistical equivalent of rigging a torpedo for delayed detonation.
Americans should be weary and apprehensive of both the historical
and the logistical parallels. They
should be acutely cognizant that the decadent recalcitrance of Nero was a
prelude to the demise not only of just the Caesar Dynasty but also, and more
significantly, of the grandeur that was the Roman Empire.
Likewise, deploying a delayed torpedo to a deliberately
camouflaged target for the sake of confusing the American public respecting
your real intentions, or to disguise the fact that you are absolutely clueless
on what you need to do or what you are doing can backfire and reduce the ship
of state to smithereens. The fallout of
such devastation would make the noonday landscape of a nuclear winter a
veritable vivacious inspiration Shangri-La.
It behooves to emphasize that the targeted killing of
Ambassador Stevens in Benghazi represents a
qualitative escalation of the Islamic jihadists’ war against us. The atrocities of 11-Sep-2001, horrific as
they might have been, were vastly and loosely targeted assaults designed to
inflict the maximum number of casualties.
In contrast, the Benghazi affair meant that the enemy’s specific tracking
and targeting capabilities for high value assets prevailed over our own counter
measures.
It does not bode well for America. If we continue to tolerate the myth that this
was all provoked by a YouTube video that hardly anybody has seen, it would
amount to a self-deception bordering on treason.
On second thought, what provoked the riot was less important than the fact that our territory was invaded and we demonstrated to the world that we could not stop it.
ReplyDeleteThe event projected what Charles Krauthammer characterized as "a declaration of weakness and passivity."{http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/charles-krauthammer-the-abandonment/2012/09/13/96b88174-fde3-11e1-b153-218509a954e1_story.html}
Conventional wisdom has it that whenever the country is at war, Americans always rally behind the Administration because we unite against a common enemy.
ReplyDeleteBut if we as citizens don't call the bladerdash that this administration is selling to hide its incompetence, we should be as guilty of treason as any who aided and abetted the attackers who murdered the Ambassador.